Apple, Google Can Challenge US Patent-Review System, Court Rules

Apple, Google, Cisco Techniques and other people can sue the US Patent and Trademark Workplace to challenge a rule that decreased the amount of patent-validity proceedings at a USPTO tribunal, a US appeals court mentioned Monday.

The US Courtroom of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a California federal court’s choice to dismiss the companies’ lawsuit and explained the agency might have failed to go via a required public notice-and-comment rulemaking course of action.

The PTO declined to comment on the ruling.

Google spokesperson José Castañeda reported the firm appreciates the determination and appears ahead to creating its circumstance at the decrease courtroom. A Cisco spokesperson mentioned the ruling reinforces that the PTO’s patent overview proceedings are “an critical car to maintain a well balanced patent system, defend innovation, and assure patent excellent in the United States.”

Reps for the other plaintiffs did not quickly answer to requests for comment.

The PTO’s Patent Trial and Attraction Board is well-known with significant tech firms that are generally specific with patent lawsuits and that use the board’s “inter partes critique” procedure to contest patents they are accused of infringing. An internal rule that gave the agency’s judges higher discretion to deny inter partes critique petitions “considerably minimized entry” to the method, the businesses advised the appeals court.

Apple, Google, Cisco, Intel and Edwards Lifesciences sued the PTO in the California federal court docket in 2020 around the rule. They argued it undermined the purpose inter partes review plays in “guarding a robust patent method” and violated federal legislation.

Organizations like Tesla, Honda, Comcast and Dell submitted briefs at the Federal Circuit in support of the plaintiffs.

The California court docket dismissed the scenario in 2021, citing US Supreme Courtroom rulings that Patent Trial and Charm Board conclusions on no matter if to review inter partes overview petitions cannot be appealed.

The Federal Circuit also rejected the companies’ arguments that the rule was arbitrary and violated US patent regulation. But the 3-choose panel stated the PTO may well have been expected to keep a period of time of community discover and remark right before creating the rule, and that it could be challenged centered on that argument.

The case is Apple v. Vidal, US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 22-1249.

© Thomson Reuters 2023

---